Trump scraps talks with Democrats amid funding clash

 September 23, 2025, NEWS

President Donald Trump just pulled the plug on a critical meeting with top Democrats, leaving the nation teetering on the edge of a government shutdown by Sept. 30. This bold move signals a deepening rift as funding negotiations stall.

According to Fox News, Trump canceled the planned Thursday discussion with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries over what he called "unserious and ridiculous demands" on the social media platform Truth Social. The clock is ticking, with lawmakers still out of Washington observing Rosh Hashanah, and the Senate not returning until Sept. 29.

Trump's frustration boiled over in a detailed post, accusing the Democratic duo of pushing "radical Left policies that nobody voted for." Well, if the goal is to protect American interests, perhaps it’s time to stop playing games with partisan wish lists and focus on keeping the government open for the people who actually pay the bills.

Funding Fight Turns Into Policy Quagmire

The canceled meeting followed a letter from Schumer and Jeffries over the weekend, pinning the risk of a shutdown squarely on Trump and the Republican shoulders. They slammed his supported short-term funding extension as "dirty" for including partisan riders, especially targeting healthcare policies.

Specifically, they criticized the extension for ignoring expiring Affordable Care Act premium subsidies and continuing what they called a "Republican assault on healthcare." If their idea of negotiation is to cry foul while demanding sweeping policy wins, it’s no wonder Trump saw the meeting as a waste of time.

Trump fired back, arguing their counter-proposal would gut nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts from his signature bill while axing a $50 billion rural hospital fund. He’s got a point: why should a stopgap measure become a Trojan horse for dismantling major legislation?

Democrats Double Down on Shutdown Blame

Schumer didn’t hold back, accusing Trump of "running away from the negotiating table before he even gets there." He warned that "Donald Trump will own the shutdown," painting the president as reckless amid rising costs and healthcare challenges.

Jeffries echoed the sentiment at a Brooklyn press conference on Tuesday, calling Trump’s statement "unhinged" and unrelated to the spending bill at hand. If they think deflecting with personal jabs will solve a funding crisis, they might want to check the calendar; Sept. 30 isn’t waiting for theatrics.

Meanwhile, Jeffries is calling House Democrats back to Washington for a Monday evening meeting, seemingly to project action while House Speaker Mike Johnson sent lawmakers home to pressure the Senate. It’s a classic game of optics, but will it fund anything?

History of Deadlocks Haunts Negotiations

Last month, Schumer and Jeffries demanded a sit-down with Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune to hash out a deal, noting Thune would need Democratic votes in the Senate. That meeting never happened, with Thune pushing back that Schumer should take the initiative if he’s serious.

Looking at past showdowns, a 2018 White House negotiation between Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and Trump led to a record 35-day shutdown over border wall funding. History suggests that when ideology trumps pragmatism, the American public pays the price.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has insisted a "clean funding extension" is all they’re after, placing blame on Democrats if a shutdown occurs. Her clarity cuts through the noise; temporary funding shouldn’t be a battleground for permanent agendas.

Partisan Riders Stall Bipartisan Solutions

Senate Republicans, including Thune, have rejected Democratic counter-proposals loaded with policy changes like repealing parts of Trump’s healthcare bill and restoring funds for NPR and PBS. Thune noted that continuing resolutions aren’t the venue for "big health policy changes," a sensible stance when time is short.

Even the House Republican bill, described as relatively clean except for security funding for lawmakers after the tragic assassination of activist Charlie Kirk, couldn’t pass muster with Democrats. When both sides dig in with non-negotiables, it’s hard to see a path forward that doesn’t hurt everyday Americans.

In the end, Trump’s call to "legislate like true Patriots" rather than hold citizens hostage rings true, even if his abrupt cancellation raises eyebrows. With the ball in Democrats’ court, as he put it, the question remains: will either side prioritize the nation over political points before the deadline hits?

About Craig Barlow

Craig is a conservative observer of American political life. Their writing covers elections, governance, cultural conflict, and foreign affairs. The focus is on how decisions made in Washington and beyond shape the country in real terms.
Copyright © 2026 - CapitalismInstitute.org
A Project of Connell Media.
magnifier