Trump Attorney Alina Habba Attacks Judge After $83M Ruling

By Victor Winston, updated on January 27, 2024

A New York jury has awarded author E. Jean Carroll a staggering $83 million in her defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump.

Habba's frustration with the trial's proceedings was evident in her statement. She claimed her team was "stripped of every defense," a sentiment that reflects the deep divide between the legal strategies of the two parties.

Trump's legal team, led by attorney Alina Habba, faced significant setbacks during the trial. Habba accused Judge Lewis Kaplan of bias, alleging that the defense was denied the opportunity to present critical evidence and witnesses. This claim underlines the contentious nature of the trial, marked by high emotions and strong allegations from both sides.

The tension in the courtroom was palpable, as Judge Kaplan's stringent approach included a threat to imprison Habba and remove Trump for disruptive behavior. Trump, who testified briefly, expressed his disdain for the proceedings, remarking, "This is not America" as he left the courtroom.

Habba's defense centered around the assertion that Carroll's claims were unproven and that critical evidence was disregarded by the court. This stance, emphasizing a lack of tangible proof, was a cornerstone of Trump's defense but failed to sway the jury's decision.

Trump's Attorney Cries Foul Over Political Bias

Habba's allegations of political bias in the trial reflect the polarized political climate surrounding the case. She suggested that the verdict was influenced by partisan politics, a claim that underscores the intersection of law and politics in high-profile cases involving political figures.

We were stripped of every defense, every single defense before we walked in there, and I am proud to stand with President Trump because he showed up, he stood up, he took the stand, and he faced this judge.

The timeline of events leading to this verdict began in the 1990s, with Carroll's initial allegations of rape against Trump. These allegations resurfaced publicly, leading to the defamation lawsuit, Washington Examiner reported.

November marked the start of the defamation trial, where Trump was found liable. In May 2023, the first trial concluded with Trump being ordered to pay $5 million in damages. The second trial, starting in January 2023, focused solely on determining the damages owed, culminating in the recent $83 million verdict.

Impact of the Verdict and Future Legal Steps

The jury's decision to award Carroll $65 million in punitive damages and $18.3 million in compensatory damages is significant.

It highlights the severity with which the jury viewed Trump's defamatory statements against Carroll.

Habba's immediate plan to appeal the verdict underscores the ongoing legal battle. The appeal, based on allegations of a biased trial and partisan motivations, is set to prolong the legal dispute.

Conclusion

The $83 million verdict in E. Jean Carroll's defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump marks a significant moment in legal history.

The trial, fraught with accusations of bias and political interference, reflects the complex interplay of law, politics, and high-profile personalities. With Habba's planned appeal, this case is far from over.

This indicates an ongoing legal saga that continues to capture the nation's attention.

About Victor Winston

Victor is a freelance writer and researcher who focuses on national politics, geopolitics, and economics.

Top Articles

The

Newsletter

Receive information on new articles posted, important topics and tips.
Join Now
We won't send you spam. 
Unsubscribe at any time.

Recent Articles

Recent Analysis

Copyright © 2024 - CapitalismInstitute.org
A Project of Connell Media.
magnifier