Representative Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) has landed in hot water over some eyebrow-raising financial secrets that just got dragged into the spotlight.
A recent report by the Washington Free Beacon uncovered that Crockett failed to disclose stock holdings in at least 25 companies during her 2022 congressional campaign, despite previously admitting to these investments as a Texas state legislator, while also dabbling in the cannabis business and pushing related reforms, as Breitbart reports.
Let’s rewind to 2021, when Crockett, then a Texas state legislator, openly acknowledged owning shares in a slew of major corporations. This wasn’t some small-time portfolio—think big names like Amazon, ExxonMobil, General Motors, AstraZeneca, Ford, and even Aurora Cannabis. Quite the diverse spread for someone now sitting in Congress, don’t you think?
Fast forward to her 2022 run for Congress, and suddenly, those stock holdings vanished from public view. Crockett didn’t disclose them during her campaign, nor after she arrived in Washington as a freshly minted representative. It took a public records request by the Washington Free Beacon, published on a Monday, to bring this omission to light.
Now, let’s talk about the optics here. Some of these companies, like ExxonMobil, don’t exactly scream “green energy champion,” a mantle Crockett has publicly worn with pride. Holding stakes in fossil fuel giants while pushing an eco-friendly image raises questions about consistency, if not outright conflict.
Worse still, several of these corporations could potentially benefit from legislation Crockett has supported or introduced in Congress. That’s not just a bad look—it’s the kind of thing that makes hardworking taxpayers wonder who their elected officials are really working for. Shouldn’t transparency be the bare minimum?
On top of the stock drama, Crockett has deep ties to the cannabis industry that might surprise some of her constituents. She actively sought to open marijuana dispensaries in Ohio, though the venture didn’t pan out. Add to that her past as a defense attorney representing a man accused of murder in a botched marijuana deal, and the plot thickens.
Yet, Crockett hasn’t been shy about her stance on cannabis reform. She’s consistently pushed for decriminalization, both in the Texas statehouse and now in Congress. Her advocacy isn’t a secret, but pairing it with personal business interests in the industry feels like a recipe for skepticism.
Speaking of her advocacy, Crockett once posted on social media in 2021, calling for a “joint effort” on cannabis reform. Clever wordplay aside, it’s hard not to wonder if her personal stakes in companies like Aurora Cannabis colored her legislative priorities. A little disclosure could have gone a long way to clear the air.
Then there’s this gem from Crockett, as reported in September: “Doesn’t make them a criminal” because it depends on the person’s “mindset.” Context aside, it’s a curious defense when applied to her own undisclosed holdings—surely, voters deserve to know the mindset behind hiding financial ties? Transparency isn’t just a mindset; it’s a responsibility.
Crockett has also been vocal on broader political fronts, often criticizing former President Donald Trump. In response, Trump didn’t hold back, labeling her and other leftist Democrats as “political hacks” who should undergo a cognitive exam, as reported by Breitbart News. While the jab stings, it’s a distraction from the core issue—her financial opacity.
Let’s not forget Crockett’s personal narrative as a self-supporting, never-married lawmaker who’s built her career as a civil rights attorney. That story resonates with many, but it doesn’t exempt her from scrutiny over these undisclosed investments. Character and accountability must go hand in hand.
For conservatives, this saga is a stark reminder of why distrust in Washington runs deep. When lawmakers like Crockett champion progressive causes while quietly holding stakes in industries that clash with their rhetoric, it fuels the perception of double standards. Voters on all sides deserve better.
Still, let’s keep perspective—failing to disclose isn’t a crime, and Crockett’s push for marijuana reform may genuinely stem from principle. But principles don’t erase the need for honesty about potential conflicts of interest. If she’s truly for the people, a full accounting of her investments shouldn’t be too much to ask.
At the end of the day, this isn’t about piling on one representative—it’s about holding all elected officials to the same standard. Crockett’s story is just the latest chapter in a long book of political hypocrisy that both parties have authored over the years. Maybe it’s time for a rewrite, one where transparency isn’t an afterthought but the opening line.
