NY Court May Compel Trump to Relinquish Firearms

 June 5, 2024

Donald Trump's eligibility to hold firearms has recently come into question.

PJ Media reported that a mistaken claim about Donald Trump purchasing a Glock-19 has drawn attention to his firearm ownership status amidst legal proceedings.

This controversy was initiated when Steven Cheung, a campaign aide, incorrectly reported that Trump had acquired a Glock pistol. The error was linked to Trump's visit to a gun store in Summerville, S.C.

Understanding the Details of Trump's Visit

During this visit, Trump showed interest in a special edition Glock-19 branded in his honor. However, he did not buy or take the firearm with him.

Following the confusion, Cheung rectified his previous statement by deleting his original post and clarifying that Trump did not acquire the weapon.

Given Trump’s current legal issues, where he stands indicted for crimes with potential sentences exceeding a year, he is precluded from purchasing firearms. This stipulation has sparked debate about whether Trump should surrender his existing firearms, as he possesses two pistols and a concealed carry license.

Navigating the Gun Control Landscape

The United States law, specifically the Gun Control Act of 1968, forbids convicted felons from possessing firearms. Moreover, New York law also prohibits such individuals from maintaining a concealed carry permit.

Legal experts suggest that Trump's case might head towards the Supreme Court if he challenges the demand to surrender his firearms.

The nuances of individual cases often complicate the discourse surrounding gun control. Adam Winkler, a noted law expert, commented on the broader implications of restricting firearm access:

Many felonies are not violent in the least, raising no particular suspicion that the convict is a threat to public safety. It is hard to imagine how banning individuals like Martha Stewart or Enron’s Andrew Fastow from possessing a gun furthers public safety.

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, referenced in 2019, underscored that the legislature can limit gun possession but strictly for individuals who pose a real threat. In his opinion, in the Bruen case, Clarence Thomas reinforced the necessity for any gun regulation to align with historical norms of firearm management, underlining the constitutional protection conferred by the Second Amendment’s text.

What Lies Ahead for Trump's Second Amendment Rights?

This ongoing issue, stemming from a simple miscommunication, has spiraled into a significant legal inquiry into Trump's rights and responsibilities under gun control laws. The former president's known ownership of firearms and the recent scrutiny poses a complex legal challenge.

As the debates continue, legal and public opinions on the matter diverge, focusing on an individual’s rights post-indictment and the collective safety of society.

In summary, the accidental report of Donald Trump purchasing a firearm has highlighted critical aspects concerning legal and constitutional considerations surrounding gun ownership. This includes his eligibility to hold firearms under current indictments and broader implications for gun control laws in general. The resolution of these questions may set precedents for how gun ownership restrictions are enforced against individuals with similar legal challenges.

About Victor Winston

Victor is a freelance writer and researcher who focuses on national politics, geopolitics, and economics.

Top Articles



Receive information on new articles posted, important topics and tips.
Join Now
We won't send you spam. 
Unsubscribe at any time.

Recent Articles

Recent Analysis

Copyright © 2024 - CapitalismInstitute.org
A Project of Connell Media.