New Evidence Revealed J6 Committee Lied About Trump’s Conduct

By Victor Winston, updated on March 12, 2024

Unexpected revelations concerning the January 6 Capitol incident have emerged, challenging previously accepted narratives.

Newly released transcripts disclose that President Donald Trump had requested the deployment of 10,000 National Guard troops to safeguard the Capitol, a claim previously contested by the January 6 Committee, Breitbart reported.

A closed-door interview conducted with Anthony Ornato, then-Deputy Chief of Staff, and overseen by former Representative Liz Cheney on January 28, 2022, revealed that President Donald Trump had indeed asked for military support during the Capitol riot. This testimony starkly contrasts the narrative promoted by the January 6 Committee, which had dismissed such claims as baseless.

Further complicating the matter, the January 6 Committee, led by Cheney, had emphasized accusations brought forward by Cassidy Hutchinson, a former Trump aide, portraying Trump in a contentious light. Contradictory testimony from various sources, including Ornato, was suppressed, painting a one-sided picture of the events surrounding January 6.

Testimony Suppression and Unveiled Truths

The January 6 Committee's suppression of Ornato's transcript suggests an oversight or intentional disregard for evidence that might have altered public perception.

Mollie Hemingway of the Federalist reported on the hidden transcript, spotlighting the discovery of the House Administration’s Subcommittee on Oversight under Representative Barry Loudermilk's guidance.

Ornato's testimony revealed that he was unaware of Trump's plans to proceed to the Capitol on January 6. He delineated previous instances where plans for Trump to attend certain events were overruled, questioning the consistency of the Committee’s narrative.

Accusations against the January 6 Committee extend to allegations of evidence destruction, despite explicit instructions from then-incoming Speaker Kevin McCarthy to preserve all materials collected during the investigation. This claim introduces concerns about the integrity of the Committee's proceedings and findings.

Legal Implications and Continuing Controversy

The context in which these revelations emerge is critical, especially as former President Trump faces federal charges unrelated to the January 6 events. The charges concern the alleged mishandling of government documents, adding another layer of complexity to Trump’s legal battles.

Despite the controversy surrounding the January 6 Committee's handling of evidence and testimony, the core issues at the heart of the Capitol riot remain deeply divisive. The debate over Trump's actions and intentions during this turbulent American history continues to polarize public opinion and discourse.

The discovery of suppressed testimony and contrasting accounts of the January 6 events highlights the challenges of uncovering truth amidst political polarization. With the release of Anthony Ornato's transcript, new questions arise about the integrity of the January 6 Committee's investigation and the veracity of its final report.


The emergence of transcripts contradicting the January 6 Committee's narrative raises significant questions about the handling of evidence and testimony. While former President Donald Trump had indeed requested National Guard support for the Capitol, this fact was suppressed, leading to a one-sided portrayal of events.

The discovery of this suppressed testimony and allegations of evidence destruction paint a complex picture of the investigation into the Capitol riot, underscoring the intricacies of political narratives and the pursuit of truth in a divided America.

About Victor Winston

Victor is a freelance writer and researcher who focuses on national politics, geopolitics, and economics.

Top Articles



Receive information on new articles posted, important topics and tips.
Join Now
We won't send you spam. 
Unsubscribe at any time.

Recent Articles

Recent Analysis

Copyright © 2024 -
A Project of Connell Media.