Native-born Americans are claiming every single job gained since President Donald Trump took the reins in January! This isn’t just a statistic; it’s a seismic shift in the labor landscape that’s got everyone talking. Let’s dive into what’s driving this trend and why it matters.
According to Breitbart, since Trump’s inauguration, the Labor Department reports that 100% of the nation’s job gains have gone to native-born workers, a stark contrast to the 52% under former President Joe Biden in 2024.
Under Biden’s watch, nearly half of the new employment went to foreign-born workers, a policy direction that many conservatives felt sidelined American citizens. Now, with Trump at the helm, the pendulum has swung hard the other way. It’s a clear message: prioritize American workers first.
The numbers don’t lie—native-born employment has surged by over two million since January. That’s a hefty win for those who’ve long argued that American jobs should go to Americans before anyone else.
Meanwhile, foreign-born employment has taken a nosedive, dropping by more than half a million. This decline ties directly to the administration’s tough stance on federal immigration enforcement, a move that’s cheered by many but not without its critics.
Speaking of critics, industry lobbyists from agriculture and hospitality are already knocking on the White House door. They’re pushing the Trump administration to open up the labor market to foreign visa workers, claiming they can’t fill positions otherwise. But with millions of Americans still jobless, is this the solution?
Let’s not forget the other side of the coin—about seven million Americans are currently unemployed. That’s a big number, and it’s hard to justify importing labor when so many are still looking for work.
Drill down further, and the stats get even grimmer: 1.6 million are long-term unemployed, stuck in a rut with no clear way out. Add to that 4.5 million working part-time but craving full-time gigs, and you’ve got a workforce desperate for opportunity. Then there’s the six million Americans who aren’t even in the labor market but say they want a job. These folks aren’t just numbers—they’re people who’ve been overlooked by a system that sometimes seems more focused on global labor than local needs.
This week, the Labor Department dropped another bombshell, announcing a new office to streamline the process for U.S. employers to bring in foreign visa workers. This move has raised eyebrows among Trump’s base, who see it as a potential contradiction to the “America First” mantra. Could this be a crack in the armor?
The Labor Department itself took to X, proclaiming, “Under [President Trump], native-born workers have accounted for ALL job gains since January.” They doubled down with a proud “American Workers First!”—a rallying cry that resonates with many who’ve felt left behind by progressive labor policies. But let’s be real: slogans won’t solve the deeper issues if that new office starts flooding the market with foreign labor.
A senior administration official, speaking to Axios, insisted this policy “is not amnesty” or even a softer version of it. Fair enough, but conservatives are watching closely to ensure this doesn’t morph into a backdoor for policies they’ve long opposed. Actions, not words, will tell the tale.
For now, the job gains for native-born Americans are a victory worth celebrating, especially for those who believe the previous administration’s policies tilted too far toward global interests. But the pressure from industry lobbyists can’t be ignored—sectors like agriculture and hotels are feeling the pinch.
Still, with millions of Americans unemployed or underemployed, the argument for prioritizing local talent over foreign visa workers feels like common sense to many on the right. It’s not about shutting doors; it’s about making sure our own house is in order first.
Trump’s administration has a tightrope to walk—balancing the needs of American workers with the demands of powerful industries. The establishment of that new Labor Department office might be a pragmatic step, but it risks alienating the very base that championed “America First.” Only time will tell if this bold labor shift holds steady or stumbles under competing pressures.
