Judge Judy Sheindlin has criticized Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's hush-money case against former President Donald Trump, calling it "nonsense" and an improper use of taxpayer funds.
Sheindlin, speaking during an interview with CNN's Chris Wallace, argued that Bragg should focus on addressing street and subway crime in Manhattan instead.
According to the Washington Examiner, Sheindlin accused Bragg of using the justice system for his own "personal self-aggrandizement." Sheindlin stated that Bragg's focus on Trump was misdirected and suggested that the district attorney should prioritize public safety issues that affect New Yorkers daily. Sheindlin remarked:
I would be happier, as someone who owns property in Manhattan, if the district attorney of New York County would take care of criminals who were making it impossible for citizens to walk in the streets and use the subway.
Sheindlin pointed out the reported reduction in subway crime and shootings as evidence that efforts to combat street crime were yielding results. The NYPD reported a 23.5% reduction in subway crime and a 25.9% reduction in shootings in March 2024 compared to the previous year. Sheindlin believes these statistics show where Bragg's focus should be.
The criticism from Sheindlin comes in the wake of a high-profile case where a jury convicted Trump of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The charges stemmed from a $130,000 payment made by Trump's former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential campaign. Sheindlin criticized the basis of the case, saying, "You had to twist yourself into a pretzel to figure out what the crime was."
Sheindlin's comments reflect her belief that the case against Trump is a misuse of judicial resources. She emphasized that Bragg's pursuit of the case is a diversion from more pressing criminal matters in Manhattan. Sheindlin, who supported former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley during the Republican primary, identifies as a political independent.
Sheindlin has never been shy about sharing her opinions, and her comments about Bragg's handling of the Trump case are no exception. She stated bluntly that she did not think Trump "ever should have been president," showcasing her critical stance on the former president's political career.
Sheindlin's call for a focus on street crime resonates with many New Yorkers who are concerned about public safety. Her critique of Bragg underscores a broader debate about judicial priorities and resource allocation. Sheindlin's emphasis on safety in public spaces aligns with recent data showing a significant drop in crime rates, suggesting that focused efforts can yield positive results.
The reductions in subway crime and shootings reported by the NYPD indicate progress in making the city safer. However, Sheindlin argues that these efforts need continuous support from the district attorney's office. Sheindlin's stance highlights a desire for sustained focus on tangible improvements in public safety rather than high-profile political cases.
Sheindlin's interview with CNN's Chris Wallace brought these issues to the forefront, sparking discussions about the best use of taxpayer money and the effectiveness of the justice system. Her sharp criticism of Bragg's handling of the Trump case invites a reevaluation of priorities within the Manhattan DA's office.
Judge Judy Sheindlin's outspoken criticism of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case against Donald Trump centers on her belief that the case is a misuse of judicial resources. Sheindlin argues that Bragg should focus on addressing street and subway crime, areas where recent NYPD data show significant improvements.
Her comments have sparked a broader discussion about judicial priorities and the best use of taxpayer funds. Sheindlin's critique aligns with her independent political stance and her history of candid public commentary. Ultimately, her remarks underscore a call for a justice system that prioritizes the safety and well-being of everyday citizens.
