Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee just tossed out three charges against President Donald Trump in Georgia’s election-interference saga. This ruling, handed down on Friday, November 14, 2025, is a punchy reminder that not every legal jab against Trump sticks. And for those of us who’ve grown weary of endless courtroom dramas, it’s a small but satisfying win for due process over overreach.
According to the Daily Caller, in a nutshell, Judge McAfee’s decision to drop Counts 14, 15, and 27—two of which directly targeted Trump—marks another twist in a case that’s seen more ups and downs than a roller coaster at Six Flags.
Let’s rewind to March 2024, when McAfee first flexed his judicial muscle by dismissing six other charges, three of them aimed at Trump. That early move hinted at cracks in the prosecution’s foundation, a signal that not all accusations would hold water. It’s the kind of scrutiny conservatives crave when they see legal battles veering into political vendetta territory.
Fast forward to months before this latest ruling, and McAfee had already tipped his hand, suggesting these specific false-document charges were on shaky ground. He couldn’t act then, as the case was out of his jurisdiction while appeals played out, but his patience paid off with Friday’s dismissal.
The dismissed charges, ruled outside Georgia’s authority to pursue, are a subtle jab at overzealous state power. For those of us skeptical of government overreach, this feels like a nod to keeping legal battles within reasonable bounds. After all, shouldn’t the law stick to what it can actually enforce?
Meanwhile, broader challenges from Trump’s team, including Supremacy Clause arguments, didn’t sway McAfee, who limited his cuts to just these three counts. It’s a balanced call—acknowledging defense concerns without tossing the whole case out the window. A fair shake, even if some might wish for a bigger knockout.
Now, let’s not forget the prosecutorial mess that’s shadowed this case since March 2024, when McAfee allowed District Attorney Fani Willis to stay on despite a glaring “appearance of impropriety” tied to her relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Paying Wade $250 an hour while the state’s top racketeering expert got $200—despite Willis claiming equal rates—raises eyebrows. It’s the kind of discrepancy that fuels distrust in a system already viewed as weaponized by many on the right.
By June 2024, the case hit a wall, paused by the Georgia Court of Appeals as defendants pushed to boot Willis entirely. That delay gave everyone a breather, but it also underscored how personal entanglements can muddy legal waters. For Trump supporters, it’s just more evidence of a prosecution with more baggage than a cross-country flight.
Enter Peter J. Skandalakis, head of the Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia, who stepped in to take over after failing to find an outside prosecutor before McAfee’s deadline. The judge even warned that without a replacement, the entire indictment could be dismissed—a cliffhanger that keeps this drama alive. It’s a stark reminder that competence, not just intent, matters in high-stakes cases.
Despite these setbacks for the prosecution, 32 charges still stand, including a central racketeering count against Trump and 14 other defendants. That’s no small potatoes, and it keeps the case breathing, even if it’s on life support for some. For conservatives, it’s a lingering cloud, but one that’s thinning with each dismissed count.
Trump attorney Steve Sadow chimed in with optimism, stating he “remains confident that a fair and impartial review will lead to a dismissal of the case entirely.” That’s a bold bet, but after these recent wins, it’s not pure fantasy. Many on the right share that hope, seeing each dropped charge as a step toward vindication against what they view as a partisan witch hunt.
Judge McAfee himself underscored the stakes, noting, “The public has a legitimate interest in the outcome of this case.” He’s not wrong—Americans across the spectrum are watching, whether they see this as justice delayed or justice denied. But for those wary of progressive overreach, his words are a call for transparency, not theatrics.
McAfee also added, “Accordingly, it is important that someone make an informed and transparent determination about how best to proceed.” It’s a polite nudge to whoever’s steering this ship—get it right, and don’t let politics cloud judgment. For conservatives, that’s a welcome sentiment in a climate where legal battles often feel like ideological warfare.
So, where does this leave us? With three fewer charges, a prosecution team in flux, and a judge trying to keep things on the rails, the Georgia case remains a lightning rod for debate. It’s a test of whether the system can focus on law over agenda, a concern that resonates deeply with those tired of woke-driven narratives. At the end of the day, this ruling is a small victory for Trump and a big question mark for a prosecution that’s stumbled more than once. For those of us who value fairness over fanfare, it’s a reminder that justice isn’t about piling on charges—it’s about proving them. Let’s see if the remaining 32 counts can stand up to that test.
