Former Capitol Police Chief Opens Up On Nancy Pelosi and Jan. 6

By Victor Winston, updated on November 26, 2023

In a stunning revelation, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund disclosed that his request to deploy National Guard troops at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, was rejected due to concerns about the perception and alleged opposition from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The refusal, as per Sund's testimony, came from House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, who cited Pelosi's expected disapproval as a key reason.

The events leading up to the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, have been scrutinized extensively. Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund has recently testified about the decisions that were made regarding the security of the Capitol on that day. Sund's testimony provides critical insights into the security preparations and the concerns raised by various officials.

Initial Request for National Guard Troops Rejected

Three days before the Capitol riot, Sund made a formal request to deploy National Guard troops to secure the Capitol. This request was directed at both Paul Irving and Michael Stenger.

Irving's immediate response was dismissive. He expressed his discomfort with the "optics" of deploying National Guard troops. Additionally, he claimed that the intelligence available did not justify such a measure. This response set the tone for the subsequent discussions and decisions.

Following Irving's rejection, Sund approached Stenger for approval. Stenger, while not directly approving the request, suggested Sund contact the Pentagon to gauge the readiness of troops if the need arose. This suggestion led Sund to discuss the matter with Gen. William Walker, who confirmed the availability of 125 troops.

Sund's Shocking Discovery

When Sund relayed Walker's response to Stenger, he was met with a surprising revelation. According to Stenger, Irving had communicated that Speaker Nancy Pelosi would strongly oppose the deployment of the National Guard.

This assertion attributed to Pelosi was a pivotal moment in the decision-making process. It reflected a higher level of political consideration, Conservative Brief reported.

Sund expressed his astonishment at this revelation. He was “floored” by the notion that Pelosi would oppose critical security measures in the face of potential unrest.

These developments took place against the backdrop of escalating tensions and warnings of potential violence. Sund's efforts to bolster security measures ultimately led to the under-prepared state of the Capitol on January 6.

Trump's Claims About Pelosi's Role

Former President Donald Trump has made public statements regarding Pelosi's role in the security decisions for January 6. According to Trump, Pelosi turned down his offer of deploying 10,000 National Guard troops for the event.

Trump's assertions add another layer of controversy to the already complex situation. His claims suggest a higher level of awareness and involvement by Pelosi in the security preparations. This was a point of contention in the ongoing discussions about the Capitol riot.

However, the accuracy of Trump's statements has been a subject of debate. The complexity of the decision-making process and the involvement of various officials make it difficult to ascertain the exact sequence of events and the motivations behind each decision.

Contextualizing the Capitol Riot

The Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, was a watershed moment in American history. The events of that day have led to extensive investigations and discussions about the state of American democracy and the security of its institutions.

These discussions have been further fueled by Sund's recent testimony, shedding light on the challenges and decisions faced by those responsible for the security of the Capitol. The revelations about the rejected request for National Guard troops have raised questions about the preparedness and responsiveness of the authorities.

The aftermath of the riot saw Sund being forced to resign from his position as Capitol Police Chief. This resignation signifies the gravity of the situation and the accountability being sought in the wake of the riot.

Sund's Testimony Sheds New Light

Sund's testimony to Congress marked his first detailed public account of the events leading up to the Capitol riot. His revelations provide a new perspective on the decisions made and the challenges faced by the security apparatus.

Sund paints a picture of a security response hampered by bureaucratic hurdles and political considerations. His testimony has sparked renewed debate about the adequacy of the security measures in place.

Sund's account aligns with the broader narrative of confusion, miscommunication, and lack of coordination for Capitol security. This narrative has been central to understanding the failures that led to the breach of the Capitol.

Conclusion

  • Steven Sund's testimony reveals a rejected request for National Guard troops due to concerns about optics and alleged opposition from Nancy Pelosi.
  • Irving's immediate rejection of Sund's request and Stenger's subsequent suggestion to contact the Pentagon highlight the complexity of the decision-making process.
  • Trump's claims about Pelosi's involvement add another dimension to the controversy surrounding the Capitol riot's security preparations.
  • Sund's revelations contribute to the ongoing discussion about the security failures and political influences that shaped the events of January 6, 2021.

Please share this article on Twitter and Facebook to contribute to the ongoing discussion about the Capitol riot and the complexities of security decisions in politically charged environments.

About Victor Winston

Victor is a freelance writer and researcher who focuses on national politics, geopolitics, and economics.

Top Articles

The

Newsletter

Receive information on new articles posted, important topics and tips.
Join Now
We won't send you spam. 
Unsubscribe at any time.

Recent Articles

Recent Analysis

Copyright © 2024 - CapitalismInstitute.org
A Project of Connell Media.
magnifier