The scale of President Joe Biden's Humanitarian Parole Program has sparked considerable debate across the political spectrum.
Senator Marsha Blackburn has expressed sharp criticism regarding the significant rise in migrants granted parole into the U.S. during President Joe Biden's administration, highlighting a stark contrast with the immigration policies of his predecessor.
Breitbart News revealed that approximately two million migrants have found temporary refuge in the United States since the program's expansion in 2022. Supporters have defended this move as a humanitarian effort, but opponents have also faced sharp criticism, arguing it constitutes a de facto open border policy.
Senator Marsha Blackburn's disdain for these policies was evident in her Breitbart News Daily appearance. She elaborated on the perceived safety risks posed by the program and the lack of communication with local authorities when migrants are flown into cities across the country.
During a recent visit to the southern border, Blackburn praised Texas for its proactive measures in border security. She noted a noticeable decline in illegal crossings in Eagle Pass, attributing it to the state's implementation of physical barriers.
The senator did not hold back in her criticisms, contrasting Biden's approach with former President Donald Trump's more stringent border policies. Under Trump, state efforts to secure the border received considerable federal support, a stance starkly different from Biden's legal actions against Texas for similar initiatives.
Historically, the use of humanitarian parole in the U.S. has been limited. Annual averages under Presidents Obama and Trump stood at approximately 5,600 paroles. However, under President Biden, these numbers skyrocketed to 800,000 in 2022 alone, with an additional 1.2 million the following year.
Blackburn pointed out that many paroled migrants obtain work visas, allowing them to gain employment, often under pseudonymous identities. This practice, she argues, poses a direct threat to public safety, emphasizing the potential risks associated with employing undocumented migrants in service delivery roles.
Sen. Marsha Blackburn is orchestrating a collective inquiry in response to these concerns. With support from fellow senators, she is drafting a letter addressed to companies employing migrants paroled under Biden's program. The letter seeks clarification on the vetting processes and safety measures in place to mitigate the risks posed by employing individuals with questionable legal status.
Senator Blackburn expressed her concerns vividly:
Now, what he does, Mike, when he gives them parole status, is they get benefits, and they get a work visa, and that’s why you have these illegal aliens that are now delivering for Uber and DoorDash and people of that nature. It is unsafe for people. I have a letter in process that other senators are signing on to send questions to these delivery companies about using these illegal aliens — many of them criminal illegal aliens — and using them for employment in the U.S. and thereby endangering the public.
This letter symbolizes a significant pushback against the employment of paroled migrants, questioning the safety of allowing them to integrate into sectors with direct public interaction without thorough background checks and oversight.
The contrast in immigration policies between the current and previous administrations has become a focal point of political discourse, influencing public opinion on border security and migrant rights. Critics argue that the parole program circumvents conventional immigration procedures, while supporters consider it a humane response to international crises.
In conclusion, President Biden's expansion of the Humanitarian Parole Program has ignited a fiery debate centered around national security, state-federal cooperation in border management, and the employment of migrants in the American workforce. As these discussions evolve, the balance between humanitarian considerations and security concerns remains a delicate issue at the forefront of American politics.
