White House retreats on NSA deputy director choice

 December 15, 2025, NEWS

Picture a ship adrift without a captain or first mate, and you’ve got the current state of the National Security Agency.

The White House has pulled its selection of Joe Francescon for deputy director of the NSA, deepening a leadership gap at a critical security agency, The Hill reported.

With the acting deputy set to retire by month’s end, both top spots at the NSA, alongside the four-star commander role at Cyber Command, remain empty. This void, already stretching for months, shows no sign of resolution.

Leadership Vacuum Sparks Concern

Rep. Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican, aired his frustration on social platform X, pointing to internal White House disputes as the culprit. He called the delay in filling these roles “gross negligence” at a time when cyber warfare looms daily.

Bacon didn’t hold back, pinning part of the blame on what he termed “whacky” interference by Laura Loomer in hiring decisions. His words cut sharp, highlighting a perceived chaos that risks national security.

“We are at Cyber War everyday and the inability to get leaders in place is gross negligence,” Bacon posted. If cyber threats are indeed a constant battle, leaving the NSA rudderless feels like handing the enemy a free pass.

Behind the Withdrawal

The White House decision to retract Francescon’s selection came without a formal nomination, since the deputy director role doesn’t require Senate confirmation. A White House official clarified this technicality to The Hill, sidestepping deeper reasons for the retreat.

Francescon, who joined the NSA in 2008 and held positions at the National Security Council and Pentagon, seemed a seasoned fit. Yet, something behind closed doors derailed his path, leaving observers to question the administration’s priorities.

Announced as the pick in August by Director Tulsi Gabbard with President Trump’s backing, Francescon’s sudden sidelining raises eyebrows. What changed in mere months to justify abandoning a veteran of national security?

Loomer’s Role and Political Tensions

Laura Loomer, a vocal Trump supporter and conservative activist, cheered the withdrawal on social media with pointed criticism. She flagged Francescon’s 2023 donation to Rep. Jason Crow, a Colorado Democrat, as a red flag.

Crow, one of six Democrats in a recent video reminding military members to reject illegal orders, clearly rankles some on the right. Loomer’s celebration suggests a litmus test of loyalty trumping experience in these decisions, a stance that could chill qualified candidates.

Her involvement, as Bacon noted, hints at a broader struggle over who shapes the administration’s security team. When ideological gatekeepers weigh in, the risk is a talent drain at a moment when expertise should reign supreme.

Security Risks in a Digital Age

The NSA’s mission to safeguard against cyber threats doesn’t pause for bureaucratic squabbles. Every day without stable leadership amplifies vulnerabilities in a world where digital attacks can cripple infrastructure overnight.

While internal debates over political purity play out, adversaries likely watch with keen interest. A house divided, especially on matters of national defense, offers cracks for exploitation.

This leadership lapse isn’t just a staffing issue; it’s a signal of disarray at a perilous time. If cyber war is the battlefield Bacon describes, then filling these roles demands urgency over infighting, lest the cost be measured in breaches and lost trust.

About Robert Cunningham

Robert is a conservative commentator focused on American politics and current events. Coverage ranges from elections and public policy to media narratives and geopolitical conflict. The goal is clarity over consensus.
Copyright © 2026 - CapitalismInstitute.org
A Project of Connell Media.
magnifier