Greene pushes for partisan split after activist's tragic death

 September 16, 2025, NEWS

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia has once again ignited a firestorm with her bold proposal to split the nation along political lines. Her latest call for a "national divorce" comes amid raw tensions following a tragic event and ongoing congressional gridlock.

According to The Hill, Greene took to social media on Monday to express her frustration with the left, claiming there's no room for dialogue after the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. She argues the country is too divided and unsafe, pushing for a peaceful separation of red and blue states.

Greene's words cut sharp when she states, "There is nothing left to talk about with the left. They hate us." Such a blanket statement ignores the possibility of shared ground, but it reflects a growing sentiment among some on the right who feel under siege by progressive hostility.

Tragic Catalyst Fuels Greene's Rhetoric

Kirk, a prominent conservative voice at just 31, was fatally shot last week during an event at Utah Valley University. The suspect, Tyler Robinson, remains in custody as investigators piece together the motive behind this shocking act.

The aftermath has been ugly, with dozens unrelated to the incident facing severe repercussions, including job losses, for comments made about Kirk's political stances. Greene seized on this, writing, "Then millions on the left celebrated and made clear they want all of us dead," a claim that amplifies division rather than mending it.

It's hard to ignore the pain in her words when she calls Kirk "our nice guy who actually talked to them peacefully debating ideas." Yet, painting the entire left as complicit in celebration risks drowning out the nuanced grief and outrage felt across the spectrum.

Funding Fights Add to National Discord

On top of this tragedy, Greene pointed to congressional dysfunction, criticizing a stopgap spending plan under discussion to avoid a government shutdown at least through mid-November. She sees this as emblematic of a deeper failure by both parties to address core issues.

Her jab at Democrats is pointed: "They are hardened in their beliefs and will flip the switch back as soon as they have power." It's a fair concern that policy swings with each election cycle create instability, though her dismissal of bipartisan efforts feels premature.

She doesn't spare her own party either, warning that expecting Republicans to "fight against evil" with their current leverage will leave supporters "extremely disappointed." This frustration with political inaction resonates with many who crave decisive leadership over endless compromise.

History of a Divisive Proposal

Greene isn't new to this idea of a national split; she first raised the concept of separating red and blue states back in February, alongside shrinking federal government reach. Her vision, while radical, taps into a real exhaustion with centralized overreach that many on the right share.

Public response, however, tells a different story, as at least one national poll showed the majority of Americans rejecting the notion of a partisan divorce. This suggests that while frustration is palpable, most still cling to the hope of a united path forward.

Greene herself admits to praying for the left, yet she doubles down with, "Personally I want nothing to do with them." It's a conflicted stance, blending spiritual goodwill with a firm rejection of coexistence under current terms.

A Call for Reflection Over Rupture

In the end, Greene's rhetoric, fueled by Kirk's tragic death and legislative stalemates, paints a grim picture of irreconcilable differences. Her solution, a national divorce, may feel like a clean break to some, but it sidesteps the messy work of rebuilding trust.

Her final thought, "Government is not answer, God is," shifts the focus to faith over politics, a sentiment that will rally some while alienating others. It’s a reminder that for many, the fight isn’t just about policy but about fundamental values.

Still, splitting a nation isn’t like dividing a business partnership; it’s a Pandora’s box of logistical and moral challenges. Greene’s plea for separation might stir the base, but it’s worth asking if the energy spent on division could be better aimed at dialogue, however tough that road may be.

About Craig Barlow

Craig is a conservative observer of American political life. Their writing covers elections, governance, cultural conflict, and foreign affairs. The focus is on how decisions made in Washington and beyond shape the country in real terms.
Copyright © 2026 - CapitalismInstitute.org
A Project of Connell Media.
magnifier