In a recent interview, former Democratic congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard confirmed her willingness to participate in a potential administration led by Donald Trump focusing on national security and foreign policy.
Tulsi Gabbard has expressed her interest in potentially joining a future Trump administration to influence its foreign policy and national security strategies, Fox News reported.
In the Fox News Digital interview conducted on September 16, 2024, Gabbard highlighted her potential areas of contribution, emphasizing her experience and interest in foreign policy and national security. The former Hawaii representative and active-duty military veteran, who served two Middle East tours, articulated her desire to mitigate the power of the military-industrial complex.
Gabbard’s military background and current position as a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army Reserves shape her views on U.S. military engagements and international diplomacy. She endorses President Trump’s initiatives for ending ongoing conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine, insisting that military action should be the last resort.
“I feel I can make the most impact in these areas of national security and foreign policy, and work to bring about the changes that President Trump talks about,” Gabbard said during the interview. Her priorities include ending unnecessary wars, potentially averting World War III, and pulling the U.S. back from the threat of nuclear war.
Gabbard has been openly critical of the current and past administrations’ approach to international affairs and diplomacy. She believes that continued escalation in places like Ukraine could pose severe global risks.
Here is how Tulsi Gabbard described her grievances and vision:
The longer this war goes on and the more that Kamala Harris Joe Biden and the neocons of Washington continue to escalate this war, the greater risk we are of a potential nuclear war, World War III.
Furthermore, Gabbard parted ways with the Democratic Party, which she accused of straying from core values such as freedom, civil liberties, and peace. This ideological shift led her to support and eventually join President Trump's transition team in August 2024.
Gabbard served as vice chair of the Democratic National Committee from 2013 to 2016 but has since become disillusioned with the party's trajectory. Her support has transitioned from figures like Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden to aligning more closely with Republican ideals, primarily under Donald Trump’s leadership. She cites a shift away from essential freedoms and peace as the main reasons for her changing political allegiance. Her alignment with Trump was made formal when she joined his transition team, signaling a major shift in her political career.
"People who recognize the same things that I have and experienced the same things that I have and realize that the Democratic Party of today doesn't stand for them, doesn’t stand for freedom, it doesn’t stand for civil liberties... doesn’t stand for peace," Gabbard explained, underlining her reasons for the move.
According to Gabbard, Trump’s administration executed diplomatic tasks that predecessors had shied away from, attributing superior diplomatic engagement to the former president relative to his successors. This experience and viewpoint significantly fuel her readiness to function within his potential future administration.
“President Trump did in his last administration what President Obama refused to do, what President Biden refused to do, what Kamala Harris has made clear she refuses to do – which is to go out and do that tough work that a president and commander in chief has to do in diplomacy,” Gabbard asserted, praising Trump’s previous term for its engagement in complex international relations.
In conclusion, Tulsi Gabbard's projected role in a potential Trump administration seeks to refocus American foreign policy and national security strategies toward the de-escalation of conflicts and enhanced diplomacy. Her military experience coupled with her political shift presents a unique perspective on contemporary foreign policy challenges, especially concerning relations with global adversaries and military engagements.
